This article provides guidance on reconciliation in cases of child sexual abuse, focusing on pastoral care, accountability, and supporting survivors with compassion and integrity.
The full Pastoral Guideline for the Ministry of Reconciliation may be downloaded below, as it runs to 46 pages.
Pastoral Guidelines with special reference to child sexual abuse
Preamble
According to both Church law and custom, the Anglican Church provides for the private confession of sinsin the presence of a priest. This practice is regulated by Church law.
The ministry of absolution has the following elements:
Canon law also regulates what is known as the Seal of the Confessional. This means that a priest must not reveal any sin that is disclosed during a confession.
It’s important to note the difference between admission to a sin and confession of a sin. If a personadmits to a crime, the priest may be required to report it to the police. If a penitent confesses a sin that is also a crime, the priest is bound by the Seal of the Confessional.
Should a priest form the view that a person wishes to reveal a criminal act, the priest should intervene immediately and ask whether the person wishes to make a formal confession (according to a rite of theChurch). If the person says yes (possibly after further explanation), the priest and the would-be penitent should go to a private place, ideally the parish church, where the confession may be heard.
It’s essential that a rite of the Church is used. If a rite is not used, the priest may have no protection under the law and could be found guilty of contempt of court for refusing to reveal the matter of the confession.
Provision for private confession of sins and absolution in the Anglican Church dates from both before and after the Reformation. Provision was contained in the Book of Common Prayer of 1662, as well as in the earlier books of Common Prayer of 1549 and 1552. This provision was clearly retained in both An Australian Prayer Book and A Prayer Book for Australia.
It’s the law of our Church that when a private confession is made in the presence of a priest, thematter of that confession is not to be revealed. This law is contained in Canon 113 of the Canons of the Church of England of 1603, and in the Canon Concerning Confessions 1989, which was adopted at the General Synod of 1992.
The Canon Concerning Confessions was then adopted by every diocese in Australia except the Diocese of Ballarat. The Diocese of Sydney adopted it in 1993 but repealed it by ordinance in 1997. This means the Canon Concerning Confessions 1989 is the law of the Church in every diocese except the Diocese of Ballarat and the Diocese of Sydney, where Canon 113 of 1603 applies.
It’s the law of our Church that when a private confession is made in the presence of a
priest, the matter of that confession is not to be revealed.
According to Canon 113 of 1603, there is one exception in relation to what is known as the Seal of the Confessional. The relevant part of that Canon reads as follows:
Provided always, that if any man confesses his secret and hidden sins to the Minister, for the unburdening of his conscience, and to receive the spiritual consolation and ease of mind from him; we do not any way bind the said Minister by this our Constitution, but do straitly charge and admonish him, that he do not at any time reveal and make known to any person whatsoever any crime or offence so committed to his trust and secrecy,(except they are such crimes as by the laws of this realm his own life may be called into question for concealing the same), under pain of irregularity.
In Australian law, there is no provision for a person to be executed for concealing a crime. Therefore, this exception to the Seal of the Confessional is not applicable in Australia. In other words, under the terms of that Canon, the Seal is absolute.
The Canon Concerning Confessions 1989 makes the following provision in relation to the Seal:
If any person confesses his or her secret and hidden sins to an ordained minister for the unburdening of conscience and to receive spiritual
consolation and ease of mind, such minister shall not at any time reveal or make known any crime or offence or sin so confessed and committed to trust and secrecy by that person without the consent of that person.
The proviso in the General Synod Canon Concerning Confessions indicates that the Seal is not binding on the priest if the penitent agrees that the matter may be revealed. This exception has generally been acknowledged by Anglican authorities.
The question of whether the law requires disclosure of the content of a confession (under Canon 113 or the Canon Concerning Confessions) can arise in two contexts:
The position on mandatory reporting of child abuse differs significantly between States and Territories. The same is true for the disclosure of a confession in court. The relevant laws are outlined on the General Synod website.
That said, Church law is clear: a priest must not reveal anything disclosed by a penitent in confession, apart from the exceptions in Canon 113 or the Canon Concerning Confessions.
Until relatively recent times, the grave damage caused by abuse was not fully understood. It was widely assumed that while abuse was unpleasant for a child, it did not result in lasting harm. We now know that this form of abuse often leads to serious psychological and spiritual damage, affecting a person’s relationships and wellbeing for many years, sometimes for life.
It was also not widely known until recently that sex offenders are often repeat offenders.
In light of this understanding and the significant suffering experienced by victims, the Church recognisesthe need for special guidelines relating to private confession and child sexual abuse. This is especiallyimportant since the Seal of the Confessional remains part of Church law.
In 2001, General Synod Resolution 24 asked the House of Bishops to:
The report of the Clergy Discipline Working Group presented to the same General Synod
clearly affirmed the priest’s obligation not to disclose the content of a confession.
The Clergy Discipline Working Group noted in paragraph 25 that three elements must be present before absolution is pronounced:
Paragraph 26 further explains that contrition and purpose of amendment may require the following actions by the penitent:
Special care will need to be taken in the case of a confession of child sexual abuse. It’simportant for a member of the clergy to whom such a confession is made to understand that this area of criminal activity involves the following common elements:
relationship.
In a case of child sexual abuse confessed by a clergy member or lay leader, the priestshould not pronounce absolution until the penitent has made appropriate reparation. In most cases, this would include:
appointment
If an apology is offered, it may not be appropriate for it to be made face-to-face. The wishes of the abused person should guide this decision. If the abused does not want contact, an apology should be written. If they are willing, the apology may be given in person.
Where the abused person is still a child, the parents’ or guardians’ wishes must be
followed.
When a confession involves child sexual abuse, the priest must act with particular care,
clarity, and pastoral responsibility. The following steps should guide the priest’s response:
This means that if a priest (who is not authorised) hears a confession involving child sexual abuse, they must tell the penitent:
“I am not authorised to pronounce absolution. However, I will arrange for an authorised priest to hear your confession for this purpose.”
Note: Exceptional circumstances may include cases where the confession is made by a person who is near death.
These guidelines are intended to help clergy respond appropriately when hearing confessions thatinvolve child sexual abuse. They outline who may grant absolution and the steps that must be taken to ensure the safety and wellbeing of all involved.
properly informed about available support services.
These Guidelines were adopted by the Australian Bishops at their Meeting in March 2006.